Hammon v. Kelly’s Empirical Analysis
980 F.2d 785 · 1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · Bryson Properties, XVIII v. Travelers Insurance Co. · McCarty Ranch Trust v. Craig · Ooley v. Schwitzer Division, Household Manufacturing Inc. · Wiley v. Mississippi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is insufficient to bring the entire class before the appellate court and requires that 32 the notice of appeal ... state the name of a proper class representative along with some general invocation of his representative capacity, such as”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“John Smith, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“use of the phrase 'et al.,' which literally means 'and others,' utterly fails to provide such notice to either intended recipient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Griffith v. Sullivan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.