FILED
IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
SEPTEMBER 29, 2022
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 173
Levi Keith Mayo, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Chandi Melissa Buchholz, Defendant and Appellee
and
State of North Dakota, Statutory Real Party in Interest
No. 20220175
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District,
the Honorable Stephanie R. Hayden, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Levi K. Mayo, self-represented, West Fargo, ND, plaintiff and appellant;
submitted on brief.
Mayo v. Buchholz
No. 20220175
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Levi Mayo appeals from the district court’s order and amended judgment
modifying his parenting time.
[¶2] In his brief, Mayo failed to adequately make any legitimate legal
arguments or provide any evidentiary record support to allow this Court to
conduct its review. Under N.D.R.App.P. 28(b), an appellant’s brief must
contain a statement of the issues presented for review; a statement of facts
and, when those facts are disputed, references to the evidentiary record
supporting the appellant’s statement of the facts; and the legal argument,
including the authorities on which the appellant relies. Mayo’s brief does not
contain a statement of the issues presented for review, a statement of facts, or
any relevant legal authority. Mayo fails to reference any evidentiary record
support for his assertions. Mayo also failed to order a transcript, therefore,
this Court has nothing to review other than hearing exhibits and the district
court’s findings and order, which contained no apparent reversible errors.
[¶3] Mayo’s brief does not meet the minimum requirements, therefore, we
summarily affirm the district court’s order and amended judgment under
N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8).
[¶4] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
1
