Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 980 P.2d 240 - State v. Pray

State v. Pray’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 114 Wash. 2d 828 - State v. Fjermestad · State v. Alvarez · State v. Alvarez · 37 Wash. App. 856 - State v. McGary · 95 Wash. App. 475 - State v. Pickett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The legislature finds that sex offenders often pose a high risk of reoffense, and that law enforcement's efforts to protect their communities, conduct investigations, and quickly apprehend offenders who commit sex offenses, are impaired by the lack of information available to law enforcement agencies about convicted sex offenders who live within the law enforcement agency's jurisdiction. Therefore, this state's policy is to assist local law enforcement agencies' efforts to protect their communities by regulating sex offenders by requiring sex offenders to register with local law enforcement agencies as provided in section 402 of this act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “on any given day between November 3 and November 13, Pray knew the place he would sleep that night, even though that place changed several times during that period.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.