Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 980 So. 2d 1169 - Meshell v. State

980 So. 2d 1169 - Meshell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Missouri v. Hunter · G-K Development Co. v. Broadmoor Place Investments · MP v. State · 934 So. 2d 1167 - State v. Paul

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ARE THE SEX ACTS PROSCRIBED BY SECTIONS 794.011 AND 800.04(4), FLORIDA STATUTES, PROPERLY VIEWED AS "DISTINCT CRIMINAL ACTS" FOR DOUBLE JEOPARDY PURPOSES, SO THAT A DEFENDANT CAN BE SEPARATELY CONVICTED FOR EACH DISTINCT ACT COMMITTED DURING A SINGLE CRIMINAL EPISODE?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “did with his penis penetrate or have union with the vagina of [the victim];”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “did with his mouth have union with the vagina of [the victim];”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.