Qualcomm v. American Wireless Group’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77 · 15 U.S.C. § 77K (§ 11 of the Securities Act of 1933)
Relies on At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the first prong, the court should determine whether the parties have agreed to arbitrate the dispute .... In order to determine if the parties have agreed to arbitrate the dispute, two considerations are taken into account: (1) whether there is a valid arbitration agreement; and (2) whether the parties' dispute is within the scope of the arbitration agreement. If the court determines that the parties did in fact agree to arbitrate their dispute, the second prong is applied. The United States Supreme Court has instructed that the second prong is whether legal constraints external to the parties' agreement foreclosed arbitration of those claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“liberal federal policy favoring arbitration,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.