J.E. v. N.K.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 31, 2007

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · decided 2007-08-31

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2010

1 state decisions

Relies on McGee v. Marcum · 897 So. 2d 234 - Ex Parte CLC · 451 So. 2d 324 - Ex Parte Hicks

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-08-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PITTMAN, Judge.

¶1AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

¶2See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R.App. P.; Ala.Code 1975, §§ 26-10A-9 and 26-10C-1; Ex parte C.L.C., 897 So.2d 234, 237 (Ala.2004); L.C.S. v. J.N.F., 941 So.2d 973, 979-80 (Ala.Civ.App.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 127 S.Ct. 504, 166 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006); and Ex parte Hicks, 451 So.2d 324, 327 (Ala.Civ.App.1984).

*429THOMPSON, P.J., and BRYAN and MOORE, JJ., concur.THOMAS, J., concurs specially.THOMAS, Judge,

¶3concurring specially.

¶4I concur because I conclude that the evidence supports a determination that the father impliedly consented to the adoption by virtue of Ala.Code 1975, § 26-10A-9(a)(3).