980 So. 2d 542 - Pena v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 829 So. 2d 901 - Swett v. State · 756 So. 2d 42 - Peart v. State · 944 So. 2d 208 - State v. Green · 971 So. 2d 832 - Markland v. State · 949 So. 2d 1163 - Arthur v. Milstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e believe the exception to the two-year limitations period, for cases already final prior to Green , was intended to apply to litigants who had not been made aware of pending removal proceedings or who had not made any attempt to have their pleas withdrawn.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“so liberally as to require a court to consider, on the merits, any and every motion so long as it is filed within two years of Green .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“file a motion comporting with the standards adopted”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.