State v. Ostrom’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · 410 So. 2d 1381 - State v. Hernandez · 738 So. 2d 556 - State v. Carlos · State v. Montgomery · 345 So. 2d 23 - City of Monroe v. French
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Since the predicate offense is not a “material ingredient” or element of the criminal DWI conduct upon which the ac ■cused’s present arrest and prosecution are based, the state should not be required to prove the commission dates of the predicate offenses when the proven conviction dates for those crimes are well within the applicable ten-year period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“For purposes of this Section, a prior conviction shall not include a conviction for an offense under this Section ... if committed more than ten years prior to the commission of the crime for which the defendant is being tried and such conviction shall not be considered in the assessment of penalties hereunder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.