Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 980 So. 2d 951 - Davis v. State

980 So. 2d 951 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brown v. State · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · 666 So. 2d 767 - Cole v. State · 954 So. 2d 968 - Ross v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is necessary that the accused associate himself in some way with the crime and participate in it with the intent to bring about the crime. Of course, mere presence at the scene of a crime and knowledge that a crime is being committed are not sufficient to establish that a defendant either directed or aided and abetted the crime unless you find beyond [a] reasonable doubt that the defendant was a participant and not a knowing spectator. In other words, you may not find any défendant guilty unless you find beyond a reasonable doubt that every element of the offense ... was committed by some person or persons, and that the defendant voluntarily participated in its commission[] with the intent to violate the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.