Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 980 SW2D 924 - State v. Webb

State v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2012

5 state decisions

30199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Monge v. California · Bullington v. Missouri · Monge v. California · Wellman v. Wellman · Wood v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the state is entitled to appeal a sentence in a case on the ground that the sentence is illegal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.