Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 981 F.2d 1142 - Hannon v. Maschner

Hannon v. Maschner’s Empirical Analysis

981 F.2d 1142 · 1992

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably United States v. Morillo (1993), Demarest v. Price (1997)

31 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

2701992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on McCleskey v. Zant · Carafas v. J · Hilton v. Braunskill · Granberry v. Greer · Martin v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “requests a substantive change in the district court's judgment or otherwise questions its substantive correctness.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]n determining whether a motion is brought under Rule 59, we look beyond the form of the motion to the substance of the relief requested.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “When the respondents fail to assert an exhaustion argument before the district court, 'we may consider it waived if the interests of comity, federalism, and justice would be served.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.