Hickey v. Ballingall

Full caption · 3 consolidated cases

Hickey (Mary Ann)v.Ballingall (David), Gage (Edward J., Jr.), Battaglia (Gail), Zweig (Ronald), Purst (Otto), Destefano (Paul), Sunkenberg (Edward W.), Josephs (John M.), Hooper (John W.), Byers (Bruce), Town Counsel, Village of Ridgewood, Vena (Leonard), Sesselman (Lillian)
Ballingal (David)v.Channel Lumber, Stewen Plumbing & Heating; Channel Lumber
American Woodmark Corp.; Hickey (Laura)v.Ballingal (David), Channel Lumber, Stewen Plumbing & Htg. Corp

Nov 27, 1992

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2018

3 district ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-11-27

Appeal From: D.N.J.

AFFIRMED.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

petitioner:Hickey (Mary Ann)
respondent:Ballingall (David), Gage (Edward J., Jr.), Battaglia (Gail), Zweig (Ronald), Purst (Otto), Destefano (Paul), Sunkenberg (Edward W.), Josephs (John M.), Hooper (John W.), Byers (Bruce), Town Counsel, Village of Ridgewood, Vena (Leonard), Sesselman (Lillian)
respondent:Ballingal (David)
respondent:Channel Lumber, Stewen Plumbing & Heating; Channel Lumber
respondent:American Woodmark Corp.; Hickey (Laura)
respondent:Ballingal (David), Channel Lumber, Stewen Plumbing & Htg. Corp