Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

981 F.2d 1250

Docket No. 92-6203, 92-6589.

Beach v. Chester

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • Devon S. BEACHv.David CHESTER; Charles T. Raiford; Stewart Raeford; John Coley; Mr. Green, Defendants-Appellees. Devon S
  • BEACHv.David CHESTER; Charles T. Raiford; Stewart Raeford; John Coley; Mr. Green

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: October 30, 1992 Decided: December 28, 1992

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-12-28

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 753 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on David A. Boetcher v. Keith A. Ivey Claudette B. Ivey Lisa D. Ivey-Jensen Richard A. Jensen

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-12-28

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Alexander B. Denson, Magistrate Judge. (CA-89-179-5-CRT-D)

Devon S. Beach, Appellant Pro Se.

Jane Ray Garvey, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Devon S. Beach appeals from the district court's orders dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) after a non-jury trial (No. 92-6203), and denying his motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense (No. 92-6589). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm in both cases on the reasoning of the district court.* Beach v. Chester, No. CA-89-1795-CRT-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 17 and Apr. 21, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We certify that this appeal is frivolous and deny Beach's motion in this Court for the preparation of a transcript at government expense pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1988)

/981/f2d/1250 · .json · Public domain