Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

981 F.2d 1250

Docket No. 92-7038.

Henson v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 30, 1992 Decided: December 21, 1992

This page is marked noindex.

Relies on David A. Boetcher v. Keith A. Ivey Claudette B. Ivey Lisa D. Ivey-Jensen Richard A. Jensen

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-12-21

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-92-1241-S)

Michael T. Henson, Appellant Pro Se.

Joan Louise Bossman, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; George Louis Huber, Jr., Huber & Lutche, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

Affirmed.

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Michael T. Henson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Henson v. Smith, No. CA-92-1241-S (D. Md. Sept. 23, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/981/f2d/1250 · .json · Public domain