Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

981 F.2d 1251

Docket No. 92-6963.

Muhammad v. Murray C/o

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: November 30, 1992 Decided: December 17, 1992

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-12-17

Cited by 35 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1993 · most notably Securities & Exchange Commission v. William S. Gotchey, and John A. Whitley (1992), Kadunc v. Commissioner (1993)

34 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-12-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

Medad El Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Medad El Muhammad appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Muhammad v. Murray, No. CA-92-6 (E.D. Va. Aug. 31, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/981/f2d/1251 · .json · Public domain