Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

981 F.2d 1253

Docket No. 92-7057.

Withrow v. Wilder

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 30, 1992 Decided: December 29, 1992

This page is marked noindex.

Relies on Ettie Weinberger v. Michael P. W. Stone

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-12-29

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-470-R)

James Thomas Withrow, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; Leigh Thompson Hanes, Wooten & Hart, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

James T. Withrow appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Withrow v. Wilder, No. CA-91-470-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 15, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/981/f2d/1253 · .json · Public domain