United States v. Leed’s Empirical Analysis
981 F.2d 202 · 1993
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably United States v. Cantwell (2006), United States v. Dean (1995)
33 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Carolco Television Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co. · Norman v. Reed · Withrow v. Williams · United States v. Cook · United States v. Sanchez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not apply to conduct committed before its adoption”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.