Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 981 F.2d 246 - Briley v. Hidalgo

Briley v. Hidalgo’s Empirical Analysis

981 F.2d 246 · 1993

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2016

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

110199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education · Bankers Mortgage Co. v. United States · Gulf Coast Building & Supply Co. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 480 · Crutcher v. Aetna Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[t]here is no time limit on an attack on a judgment as void. The one-year limit applicable to some Rule 60(b) motions is expressly inapplicable, and even the requirement that the motion be made within a”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.