Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 981 F.2d 340 - Davis v. Tri-State Mack Distributors, Inc.

Davis v. Tri-State Mack Distributors, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

981 F.2d 340 · 1992

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
3
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Ellison v. Brady · Hall v. Gus Construction Co. · Katz v. Dole · Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “prompt remedial action reasonably calculated to end the harassment.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “sexual harassment if the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “does not require an employer to fire a harasser.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.