Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 981 F.2d 481 - Card v. Singletary

Card v. Singletary’s Empirical Analysis

981 F.2d 481 · 1992

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2023 · most notably Francis S. v. Stone (2000), Medina v. Singletary (1995)

10 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

1801992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Carnegie v. United States · Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] defendant [must] present 'clear and convincing evidence to create a real, substantial and legitimate doubt as to [his] mental capacity ... to meaningfully participate and cooperate with counsel....'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[N]ot every manifestation of mental illness demonstrates incompetence to stand trial; rather, the evidence must indicate a present inability to assist counsel or understand the charges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the standard of proof is high [and] the facts must positively, unequivocally, and clearly generate the legitimate doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.