Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 981 F.2d 521 - Ward v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Ward v. Merit Systems Protection Board’s Empirical Analysis

981 F.2d 521 · 1992

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
1
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Ellison v. Merit Systems Protection Board (1993), Marano v. Department of Justice (1993)

19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

2401992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1213 · 5 U.S.C. § 1214 · 5 U.S.C. § 1221 · 5 U.S.C. § 2302 · 5 U.S.C. § 7701

Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corp. · Manning v. Merit Systems Protection Board · Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he purpose of the requirement that an employee exhaust his or her remedies before the Special Counsel before appealing to the Board is to give the Special Counsel the opportunity to take corrective action before involving the Board in the case. For the exhaustion remedy to serve its intended purpose, however, the employee must inform the Special Counsel of the precise ground of his charge of whistle-blowing. He must "give the Office of Special Counsel sufficient basis to pursue an investigation which might have led to corrective action." Knollenberg, 953 F.2d at 626 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “seek corrective action from the Special Counsel before seeking corrective action from the Board.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the agency would have reached the same ultimate result”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.