United States v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis
981 F.2d 591 · 1992
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably United States v. Martinez-Molina (1995), United States v. Parrilla-Tirado (1994)
43 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ristaino v. Ross · Jones v. Atchison · United States v. Barker · United States v. Dietz · United States v. Kobrosky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f the combined weight of these factors tilts in the defendant's favor, then the court must also assess the quantum of prejudice, if any, that will inure to the government.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] long interval between the plea and the request often weakens any claim that the plea was entered in confusion or under false pretenses.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the force of the defendant's proferred reason [for withdrawal]; the timing of the request; [and] the defendant's assertion of legal innocence (or the lack of such an assertion).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.