United States v. Espinal’s Empirical Analysis
981 F.2d 664 · 1992
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2019
10 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Young · United States v. Beddow · United States v. Walling · United States v. Friedman · United States v. Robert Phares Hoy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“consider the objectionable remarks within the context of the entire trial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[c]urative measures constitute only one part of the analysis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.