Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 981 F.2d 726 - Hampton Industries, Inc. v. Sparrow

Hampton Industries, Inc. v. Sparrow’s Empirical Analysis

981 F.2d 726 · 1992

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
November 2016
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2016

8 federal appellate ·

150199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Massachusetts · Fmc Corporation v. Holliday · Thompson v. Talquin Building Products Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “limits on subrogation recoveries appear to be aimed at the insurance industry, and therefore would also appear to come within the scope of the saving clause”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`relate [s] to' an employee benefits plan within the meaning of the preemption clause”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.