Baudoin Bank of Lafayette v. F Baudoin H’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 4 district · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Southmark Corporation Southmark Corporation v. Coopers & Lybrand (1999), In Re: Piper Aircraft Corporation
7 federal appellate · 4 district · 30 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pacor Inc. v. Higgins · Matter of Wood v. P Wood & Pa · Colley v. National Bank of Texas · Wrenn v. Board of Directors · Hendrick v. Avent
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'have repeatedly confirmed that federal law is applicable to consideration of whether a federal court judgment has res judicata effect.' " Jones ex rel. Jones v. GEO Grp., Inc. , 08-1276 p. 5 (La. App. 3 Cir. 4/1/09), 6 So.3d 1021 , 1025 (quoting Green v. Iberia Parish Sch. Bd ., 06-1060, p. 3 (La. App. 3 Cir. 12/20/06), 945 So.2d 940 , 943 ). 16 "A bankruptcy judgment, just as any judgment under federal res judicata law, bars a subsequent suit if all of the following tests are satisfied: 1) both cases involve the same parties; 2) the prior judgment was rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction; 3) the prior decision was a final judgment on the merits; and 4) the same cause of action is at issue in both cases.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“At issue is whether Chapter 7 debtors may, three years after discharge, bring a lender liability action in state court against their creditor”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the numerous and substantial reasons for the doctrine of [claim preclusion] are too well known, and obvious, to bear repeating.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.