Hexamer v. Foreness’s Empirical Analysis
981 F.2d 821 · 1993
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2023
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1442 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 39 U.S.C. § 409 · 42 U.S.C. § 659 (§ 459 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 660 (§ 460 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on International Primate Protection League v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund · Franchise Tax Board of California v. United States Postal Service · Peoples Gas, Light & Coke Co. v. United States Postal Service · United States v. Harrison · Maine Ass'n of Interdependent Neighborhoods v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction, without regard to any amount in controversy, to hear and determine any civil action certified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 652(a)(8) of this title. A civil action under this section may be brought in any judicial district in which the claim arose, the plaintiff resides, or the defendant resides.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he plain language of section 1447(c) requires the district court to remand the case when it finds that subject matter jurisdiction is lacking.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doddy“[i]f at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doddy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.