Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 981 F.2d 858 - Leroy M. Gill v. Moco Thermal Industries, Incorporated Ronald L. Konczalski

Leroy M. Gill v. Moco Thermal Industries, Incorporated Ronald L. Konczalski’s Empirical Analysis

981 F.2d 858 · 1992

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
July 2000
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. Bruch · Webster v. Reproductive Health Services · Clampitt v. Interinsurance Exchange · In re Disbarment of Cooper · Musto v. American General Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must look to the intent of the parties and apply federal common law of contracts to determine whether welfare plan benefits have vested.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “there is simply no factual basis for the application of estoppel”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.