Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 981 F.2d 97 - Bridge v. United States Parole Commission

Bridge v. United States Parole Commission’s Empirical Analysis

981 F.2d 97 · 1992

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
3
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Magnesium Elektron, Inc. (1997), Hamilton v. Leavy (2003)

21 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions

2401992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Sullivan v. Finkelstein · Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. · Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Food Store Employees Union, Local 347

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen a district court remands a case to the Parole Board for failure to adequately explain its decision and, on remand, the Commission again declines to articulate a basis for the identical conclusion, [may] a district court ... permanently decide this issue on the record before it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If a second judgment revises the litigants' legal rights or plainly resolves an ambiguity that had not been clearly settled, however, then an appeal from the second judgment may challenge any issues resolved or clarified by the second judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “court can grant the writ of habeas corpus and order the prisoner discharged from custody.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.