United States v. Wang’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 46
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Basic Inc. v. Levinson · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · Dirks v. Securities & Exchange Commission · United States v. O'Hagan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] variance is grounds for reversal only if it is prejudicial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To complete our review, we 'consider all the evidence, direct and circumstantial, in the light most favorable to the prosecution, draw all reasonable inferences consistent with the verdict, and avoid credibility judgments, to determine whether a rational jury could have found the defendants guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“we take the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, draw all reasonable inferences [in the government's favor], and ask whether a rational jury could find that the government proved all the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.