Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 981 F.3d 70 - United States v. Ackerly

United States v. Ackerly’s Empirical Analysis

2020

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
January 2024
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 3731

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Olano · Crawford v. Washington · Kotteakos v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'indisputable' error [that] warrants correction on plain error review,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.