Wills v. Radioshack Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 207
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Auer v. Robbins · Christensen v. Harris County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the employee's hours fluctuate from week to week; (2) the employee receives a fixed weekly salary which remains the same regardless of the number of hours the employee works during the week (excluding overtime premiums); (3) the fixed amount is sufficient to provide compensation at a regular rate not less than the legal minimum wage; (4) the employer and employee have a clear mutual understanding that the employer will pay the employee a fixed salary regardless of the number of hours worked; and (5) the employee receives a fifty percent (50%) overtime premium in addition to the fixed weekly salary for all hours worked in excess of 40 during the week.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Section 778.114 was issued by the DOL as an interpretive bulletin. It was not subject to formal notice and comment rulemaking proceedings, and was therefore itself not entitled to deference. But because § 778.114 represents the Secretary of Labor's implementation of the Supreme Court's holding in Missel , courts have afforded it a measure of deference.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“of base pay inconsistent with the FWW's requirement of a fixed weekly salary. They argue that the reasons for any shortfall in base pay, even an inadvertent payroll error, are irrelevant. See Pl. Br. at 16; Pl. Reply Br. at 2. Because these six weeks present distinct issues, the Court addresses them separately. To begin with, the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.