When this Court views evidence admitted at trial in a light most favorable to a verdict, and finds sufficient evidence exists that would allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of conviction, a criminal judgment must be affirmed.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2023
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
FILED
IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
NOVEMBER 10, 2022
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 195
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Eldrey Marchone Lane, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20220164
Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central
Judicial District, the Honorable Jay D. Knudson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ashlei A. Neufeld, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff
and appellee; submitted on brief.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on
brief.
State v. Lane
No. 20220164
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Eldrey Marchone Lane appeals from a criminal judgment entered after
a jury convicted him of driving under suspension. Lane argues the evidence
presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. Viewing the
evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude sufficient
evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor
of conviction. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
1
