Jacko v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2022
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Walker v. City of Birmingham · Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New York · Miller v. State · Jurco v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even though a court's restraining order or infunetion may be factually unjustified (even obviously factually unjustified, as was the case here), the persons subject to that order must nevertheless obey it until the order is vacated or reversed through process of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tenison v. State“a person is obliged to obey a restraining order-even an illegal one-until, through judicial process, the order is vacated or reversed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Olson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.