People v. Mayes’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on General Electric Co. v. Niemet · Deutschendorf v. People · People v. Hartkemeyer · People v. Barth · United States v. Alamillo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For any offender who is incarcerated for an offense committed on or after July 1, 199S, upon application for parole, the state board of parole ..., using the guidelines established pursuant to § 17-22.5-404, shall determine whether or not to grant parole. The state board of parole, if it determines that placing an offender on parole is appropriate, shall set the length of the period of parole at the mandatory period of parole established in section 18-l-105(l)(a)(V), C.R.S. (emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Martin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.