Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 981 P2D 475 - Swanson v. State

Swanson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Blackledge v. Perry · United States v. Goodwin · United States v. Raymer · Leppek v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[wle have consistently held that, even though it is possible to draw other inferences from the evidence which has been presented, the jury has the responsibility to resolve conflicts in the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In order to prove larceny, the State must prove that the defendant intended to ... deprive the rightful owner of the property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.