Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 981 So. 2d 169 - Cannon v. Bertrand

981 So. 2d 169 - Cannon v. Bertrand’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Adams v. United States · 714 So. 2d 231 - Head v. Head · 549 So. 2d 833 - Shopf v. Marina Del Ray Partnership · Smith v. James · 736 So. 2d 996 - R. LEWIS SMITH, JR. v. James, Hardy & Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Art. 2823. Rights of a partner after withdrawal The former partner, his successors, or the seizing creditor is entitled to an amount equal to the value that the share of the former partner had at the time membership ceased. Art. 2824. Payment of interest of partner If a partnership continues to exist after the membership of a partner |aceases, unless otherwise agreed, the partnership must pay in money the amount referred to in Article 2823 as soon as that amount is determined together with interest at the legal rate from the time membership ceases. Art. 2825. Judicial determination of amount If there is no agreement on the amount to be paid under Articles 2823 and 2824, any interested party may seek a judicial determination of the amount and a judgment ordering its payment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.