Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 981 So. 2d 260 - State v. Chatman

981 So. 2d 260 - State v. Chatman’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chimel v. California · New York v. Belton · South Dakota v. Opperman · Rawlings v. Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ultimately concluded that it was not error for the trial court to refuse to instruct the jury on possible penalties in cases where the jury determines only issues of guilt or innocence and the trial court imposes the penalty because, in those cases, the penalty is simply of no concern to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.