981 So. 2d 585 - McDonnell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Florida v. Royer · Bumper v. North Carolina · Nix v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he inevitable discovery doctrine will not be applied in every case where the police had probable cause for a search warrant, but failed to get one.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Id. On appeal, the Third District affirmed the trial court's denial of the motion to suppress. Id. Our supreme court reversed, concluding that the trial court's application of the inevitable discovery doctrine was improper because the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.