State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably State v. Edwards (2003), State v. Baumruk (2009)
1 federal appellate · 38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · Wainwright v. Witt · Murphy v. Florida · Lockhart v. McCree · Morgan v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The purpose of voir dire is to discover bias or prejudice in order to select a fair and impartial jury.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jones · State v. Beckett“'not entitled to voir dire on specifics of the case being tried,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martinez v. State“one juror left the room erying after viewing autopsy photos of”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martinez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.