Jimenez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2004
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 227th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Almanza v. State · Archie v. State · Williams v. State · Chavez v. State · Langston v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To agree with the State that it is permitted to allege as many prior convic tions as it chooses, but that the State is required to prove only two prior convictions, endorses conviction based on general character evidence. For this reason, even if the application paragraph could be reasonably interpreted as requiring the jury to find two prior convictions, the State was required to prove three prior convictions because the State included three prior convictions in the indictment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(b) If it is shown on the trial of an offense under Section 49.04, 49.05, or 49.06 that the person has previously been convicted two times of an offense relating to the driving or operating of a motor vehicle while intoxicated, an offense of operating an aircraft while intoxicated, or an offense of operating a watercraft while intoxicated, the offense is a felony of the third degree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barfield v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.