Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 981 SW2D 415 - Exxon Corp. v. Garza

Exxon Corp. v. Garza’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2011

8 state decisions

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 229th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on North East Independent School District v. Aldridge · Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc. · Keetch v. Kroger Co. · Redinger v. Living, Inc. · Mafrige v. Ross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because our supreme court has repeatedly `decline[d] to eliminate all distinction between premises conditions and negligent activities,' id., we must determine whether [Laurel's] injuries resulted from a condition or an activity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.