Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 981 SW2D 651 - Root ex rel. Root v. Mudd

Root ex rel. Root v. Mudd’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Borgstede v. Waldbauer · Fowler v. Park Corp. · Lester v. Sayles · Wilson Ex Rel. Wilson v. Shumate · Schlegel v. Knoll

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Counsel shall make specific objections to instructions considered erroneous. No party may assign as error the giving or failure to give instructions unless that party objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds of the objection. Counsel need not repeat objections already made on the record prior to delivery of the instructions. The objections must also be raised in the motion for new trial in accordance with Rule 78.07.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.