Caicedo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2002
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Aguilar v. State · Bignall v. State · Lugo v. State · Schweinle v. State · Ramos v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“language in the jury charge: If a defendant either presents evidence that he committed no offense or presents no evidence, and there is no evidence otherwise showing he is guilty only of a lesser included offense, then a charge on a lesser included offense is not required. Bignall v. State, 887 S.W.2d 21, 24 (Tex. Crim.App.1994); Caicedo v. State, 981 S.W.2d 817, 819 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd) (emphasis in originals). In the present case, I agree with the majority that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.