Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 982 A2D 752 - Etchebarne-Bourdin v. Radice

Etchebarne-Bourdin v. Radice’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

7 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hanson v. Denckla · Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. · Miller v. Avirom · Reuber v. United States · Gould v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “serve to filter out cases in which the inforum impact is an isolated event and the defendant otherwise has no, or scant, affiliations with the forum.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) A District of Columbia court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a person, who acts directly or by an agent, as to a claim for relief arising from the person's— (1) transacting any business in the District of Columbia; (2) contracting to supply services in the District of Columbia; (3) causing tortious injury in the District of Columbia by an act or omission in the District of Columbia; (4)causing tortious injury in the District of Columbia by an act or omission outside the District of Columbia if he regularly does or solicits business, engages in any other persistent course of conduct, or derives substantial revenue from goods used or consumed, or services rendered, in the District of Columbia; [[Image here]] (b) When jurisdiction over a person is based solely upon this section, only a claim for relief arising from acts enumerated in this section may be asserted against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The District of Columbia’s long-arm statute is co-extensive with the reach of personal jurisdiction permitted under the Due Process Clause.”) Ultimately, the Court finds that it need not decide this question, and therefore it shall analyze subsection (a)(4) separately from the constitutional requirements. 5 . Because of the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.