Campbell v. Blodgett’s Empirical Analysis
982 F.2d 1321 · 1992
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Gregg v. Georgia · Teague v. Lane · Furman v. Georgia · Lockett v. Ohio · Rose v. Lundy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] different factual basis or argument asserted to support the same legal theory advanced previously does not constitute a new ground for relief and is successive.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a colorable showing of factual innocence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[a] petitioner may not create a different ground merely by alleging different facts, asserting different legal theories, or couching his argument in different language.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.