Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 982 F.2d 1422 - United States v. Powell

United States v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

982 F.2d 1422 · 1992

Citation profile

117
cited by 117 later decisions
2
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

62 federal appellate · 11 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 117 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably United States of America v. Dennis McClatchey (2000), United States v. Edwards (1995)

62 federal appellate · 11 district · 7 state decisions

6001992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Kotteakos v. United States · United States v. Young · United States v. Frady · Carnegie v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 117 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a conspiracy is proven by a preponderance of the evidence; (2) the declarant and the defendant were both members of the conspiracy; and (3) the statements were made in the course and furtherance of the conspiracy.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] defendant is accountable for the quantity of drugs within the scope of the conspiracy and reasonably foreseeable.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]f a defendant's actions facilitated the endeavors of other coconspirators or facilitated the venture as a whole,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.