Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 982 F.2d 168 - United States v. Bashaw

United States v. Bashaw’s Empirical Analysis

982 F.2d 168 · 1992

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
June 2017
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably United States v. Monus (1997), United States v. Crozier (2001)

35 federal appellate · 1 district ·

250199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1503

Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Kahn v. Grant · In re Martin-Trigona · Unimet Corp. v. United Steelworkers · Pettibone v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether the evidence is sufficient to justify the trial judge, as trier of facts, in concluding beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]hoever ... corruptly ... influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.