Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 982 F.2d 196 - United States v. Range

United States v. Range’s Empirical Analysis

982 F.2d 196 · 1992

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2021

8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

801992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Fussell v. Price · United States v. Chambers · United States v. Head

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For this court to perform its function properly, ... the record developed below must indicate with specificity what facts the district court considered in reaching its offense level calculation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.