Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 982 F.2d 329 - Jenner v. Smith

Jenner v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

982 F.2d 329 · 1993

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

51 federal appellate · 14 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2024 · most notably Clark v. Murphy (2003), United States v. Lebrun (2004)

51 federal appellate · 14 district · 6 state decisions

3401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Colorado v. Connelly · Oregon v. Mathiason · Sumner v. Mata

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Numerous cases have held that questioning tactics such as a raised voice, deception, or a sympathetic attitude on the part of the interrogator will not render a confession involuntary unless the overall impact of the interrogation caused the defendant's will to be overborne.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`[T]here is nothing inherently wrong with efforts to create a favorable climate for confession.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “great weight to the considered conclusions of a coequal state judiciary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.