Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 982 F.2d 354 - United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

982 F.2d 354 · 1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
May 1993
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 20 U.S.C. § 1097 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis v. Carver · Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Landry · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · Youngberg v. United States · United States v. Lira-Barraza

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he record in this case indicates nothing more than that a single sentencing proceeding was used for reasons of judicial economy. Indeed, by imposing consecutive sentences, the sentencing court ... indicated that it viewed the [crimes] as distinct offenses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “are not related for purposes of section 4A1.2(a)(2) absent a showing that the sentencing court treated the cases as involving a single consolidated offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “relevant conduct” according to section 1B1.3. See U.S.S.G. §§ 4A1.1 comment (n. 4-5), 4A1.2 comment (n. 8). Section lB1.3(b) and the accompanying background commentary do provide that the rules of construction under lB1.3(a) concerning relevant conduct do not necessarily apply in chapter four to determine the criminal history category. But when chapter four specifically defines the term”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.